Saturday, 28 February 2015

The Lost Dhow: Cultural Heritage and Museum Engagement

[Speech remark at symposium of the Lost Dhow exhibition program, Aga Khan Museum, Toronto, Feb 28th 2015]

Museums in the 21st century is transforming its mission and purpose to be more public-open and public-facing institutes with multi-platform venues for exhibition, programs, and educations. Museum engagement to the public is the key nowadays to museum’s survivals financially but also reputably.  However, it is easily said than done. The challenge is how we can have a hard look on what we do to find a common ground with our visitors to be engaged.

Among many things, archaeology and museum share one thing: that is – preserving cultural heritage on behalf of the public. Professionals in both field of archaeology and museum take it for granted that the public would be equally excited about, and care for, cultural heritages, as much as we do. But as a matter of fact, they don’t. At least not show in general their enthusiasms towards preserving cultural heritage as much as we do.

So a question for us who are doing archaeological fieldwork and who are curating the exhibition is – what cultural heritage means to our public? Why cultural heritage matters to the public who should care come and visit museums. It is my believe that without clear understanding what cultural heritage means to the public, and what the museum can do for them, then the public will stay away from museums and instead stay tuned with youtube and facebooks.

Really this question in particular is why the public care for coming to the Aga Khan Museum to see the exhibition of “the Lost Dhow”; and what we have done or can do so that people are consciously knowing that the story told in the exhibition matters to them, via which they would care a bit more about heritage after they walked out of the door?

Cultural heritage in many ways are intangible, it is more about the memory of their past and re-experience their past. But the past are pleasantly accessed, viewed and learned effectively in its tangible forms. Artefacts and remains of the past have a distance to our life today, as people’s life nowadays is inundated with virtue technologies.  The reason people are enjoying the life of social networking is because they can be connected in common grounds. And in particular, social networking provides a connection for people who live in different spaces, who may never meet, because they share feelings and memories of tangible substances. The fact is that they care for their feelings, not the substances.

Therefore, preserving cultural heritage and educating cultural heritage in today’s museum is to find a substance that people can share the feeling with the past. Telling the story and providing experience in the exhibition are something we can do, but what is more to this is to make the story more relevant to our life today, and to have public experience what could be the same feeling in the past.

And such experience and such substances are in the Lost Dhow, as far as I am concerned.

For example, many of us are afraid to talk about the moral values and ethics in archaeological practices behind the discovery of the Belitung shipwreck. We as professional in archaeology and museum always position ourselves in political correctness because we want to tell the public what is right from wrong. Ironically, I find that is exactly what the public dismay about the exhibition, because they don’t want to be treated as non-brainers.

What the public wants is to participate in the debate, offering their experience of practice and judging from their own point of view, regardless right or wrong. At the end of the day, both sides would learn a great deal about why cultural heritage matters, and then they would find our coming to see Belitung shipwreck exhibition is more than just viewing treasures recovered within. Now they know there are different points of views regarding the discovery of the treasures. Speaking of education, learning preservation of cultural heritage, this is the best case that we can use for publication education and learning.

In this case, the learning is not just about the archaeological discovery, but learning how to discovery and why to discovery, at the bottom-line, that is for the preservation of cultural heritage.


Then, my next question about the cultural heritage, as I mentioned above, is how we raise the visitor’s interests in shared feeling that connect the past and the present?

By that I am asking what today’s visitors can feel what the people did in the 9th century that would have some meaningful matters to people today.  In the Lost Dhow, I see “trade and commodity”, a daily life and social-economic phenomena that lasted as long as human can move around on global. Trade needs goods, trade needs products, trade needs consumption, trade needs contact, and much more. Trade is all about desire of people, which we have today. 

The exhibition tells that desire for the trading in distance and commodity in consumption stay the same way as today, and tragedy and scarifying to make a living are still in the same way that we can feel today. This phenomena provide shared feeling and memories that today’s population may be easily connect to the past.

What is more fascinating about the trade and commodity, like it or not, is due to the fact that post-discovery has led to sells of a substantial amount of remains. Therefore 1200 years old commodity become modern commodity again traded in art-market. That is what meant about the connection of intangibles. Regardless the disagreement in the field of professionals, we are responsible for telling the facts to the public, what happened in 1200 year ago, as well as what happened 15 years ago to the commodity with the story. We are living a world of trade and commodity, all of our visitors know that before they know about the discovery of Belitung shipwreck. “It’s the EconomyStupid”!


My last question concerning about cultural heritage is: whose heritage the treasures from the Belitung shipwreck are presenting?  It is again another classic case that our professional take the answer for grant, but the public has their own opinion, sometimes very strong ones. Whatever they treasures, they will link about the past of their own. In some cases, it is black and white clear, but in case of trade and commodity, the boundary never can be drawn. And the latter is the case for the Last Dhow exhibition. To me it is a perfect case to bring up this question for public engagement. Asking our visitors, whose cultural heritage that belongs to? Answering the question is a course of learning.

The ship was made Arabic, products were made in China; trading posts happened in both Tang and Abbasid empires? And the owner of the boat might be Arabic but the crew were likely international, And now both shipwrack and products belong to different nations and states including public and private institutes and collectors everywhere in the world.

Allow me to use analogy, - iPhone! It is product of USA, but made in China, distributed worldwide, and used in everyday households. Imaging, in another 1000 hundred years, if a cargo of unpacked iPhone were found in North Korea, that presumably was smuggled into and abounded by a group of brave North Korean. So whose heritages are represented by these iphone story?

Clearly in the year of 3000, iPhones being 1000 years old are remains of human past, but the heritage is about a group of brave North Korean and their untold story.

And imaging again, if the cargo ship found near the Belitung island did not sink and successfully sailed to its supposed destination, we would never know this part of history. It is gone with monsoon winds. So whose heritage that may represent? The questions would not be answered, but trying to answer questions like this is in fact to engage in our visitors who may be aware that they indeed find something that are lost in the Lost Dhow treasures.


Therefore I would argue that museum engagement is not just to make story better told, but to create a platform for dialogue with our visitors and among ourselves, like what we do now. 


Friday, 18 April 2014

Treasures from the Forbidden City (4): Treasure box

[posts in this series are to introduce objects on display in the exhibition "the Forbidden City: Inside Court of China's Emperor" at Royal Ontario Museum, March 8 - September 1, 2014; and at Vancouver Art Gallery Oct 18, 2014 - Jan, 2015]

Treasure box
紫檀百寶嵌三多紋書式盒
Inlaid Sandalwood
Qing dynasty

The Palace Museum, Gu122686 



 This is one of the rarest and most exquisite treasure boxes from the Forbidden City.

When closed, this box looked like any other, decorated to resemble a book. But inside, Emperor Qianlong hid some of his most prized small treasures. Multiple compartments, some hidden away themselves in the box’s many layers, created a more intimate display than wall shelves. This type of treasure box (duobaoge 多寶格) was one of Qianlong’s favorite items. 


Friday, 28 March 2014

Treasures from the Forbidden City (3): Bird's-Eye View of the Capital City

[posts in this series are to introduce objects on display in the exhibition "the Forbidden City: Inside Court of China's Emperor" at Royal Ontario Museum, March 8 - September 1, 2014; and at Vancouver Art Gallery Oct 18, 2014 - Jan, 2015]


Bird's-Eye View of the Capital City, Inspired by Emperor Longing's Poems. 
京師生春意圖軸
Xu Yang (徐揚, ­1750–after 1766­)
Ink and colour on silk
Qing dynasty, Qianlong period, 1767
The Palace Museum, Xin­146672



This large hanging scroll is presented as the first artwork of this exhibition at the entrance to the Forbidden City exhibition.

During the New Year season, the snowy imperial capital bustled with life. Shoppers were busy in the commercial district of the outer city. To the north, layers of walls, gates, and towers blocked them from the emperor’s palace, the Forbidden City. The grand architectural organization of the capital reinforced a highly structured vision of a centralized and expansive rule from within the walls of the even more structured palace.

Emperor Qianlong wrote 20 poems about early spring, describing scenes, customs, and activities of both imperial families and common people—newly spouted grasses, setting fi recrackers, hanging auspicious omens, ice skating and more. A court painter put this scene together based on Qianlong’s poems, including them on the painting itself. Together the poems.





Where is early spring?
In the playfulness of ice-skating.
Blades swirl, kicking up frost-flakes,
twirling skaters slide past like whirlwinds,
juggling so many balls my eyes cannot follow,
effortlessly, no doubt, playing their sport.
I rewarded them accordingly,
officials raised a cheer.

[For more, please consider purchasing the exhibition Souvenir guidebook]

Saturday, 22 March 2014

Treasures from the Forbidden City (2): Plate with Dragon Design


[posts in this series are to introduce objects on display in the exhibition "the Forbidden City: Inside Court of China's Emperor" at Royal Ontario Museum, March 8 - September 1, 2014; and at Vancouver Art Gallery Oct 18, 2014 - Jan, 2015]

Plate with dragon design
嘉靖款黃地青花勾蓮大盤
Blue-and-white porcelain with overglazed yellow enamel.
Ming dynasty, Jiajing mark and period
Diameter 80.7 cm
The Palace Museum, Gu144700



Dragons were the ultimate symbol of imperial power and adorned many of the emperor’s possessions, from everyday utensils to artwork and costumes, and even the palace itself. More than 12,600 dragon designs are said to have been incorporated into the architecture of the Forbidden City. The emperor’s dragons were special, with features that identified them as imperial. One such feature is illustrated on this beautiful dish — only the emperor’s dragons had five claws.

This is one of the finest early-Ming porcelains from the imperial kilns at Jingdezhen. Beyond its unusually large size, this plate was the rare product of a twice-glazed technique. First, the makers fired a common blue-and white dish featuring a forward-facing dragon surrounded by intertwined lotus flowers. Then they covered the original white glaze with an iron-rich glaze and fired the dish again, this time at a lower temperature. The result was an imperial yellow background.


简说:盘敞口,弧壁,圈足。通体黄地青花装饰。盘内壁绘四条龙穿行于缠枝莲纹中间,盘心绘一正面龙,周围衬以缠枝莲纹,外壁绘缠枝莲纹。圈足内布涂满火石红。口沿外侧从左向右置青花楷体“大明嘉靖年制”六字一行款,外围青花双栏。黄釉青花为明宣德时首创的高温与低温釉相结合的品种,成化时更加温润而浅淡,正德、弘治、嘉靖时皆有烧制。它是在青花烧成后再于白釉地上挂黄釉后入窑烘烤而成。凝重浓艳的青花纹饰与浅淡的黄釉地相互辉映,更显立体艺术效果。


[For more, please consider purchasing the exhibition souvenir guidebook at ROM shop or online]


Treasures from the Forbidden City (1): Imperial Yellow Bowl

[posts in this series are to introduce objects on display in the exhibition "the Forbidden City: Inside Court of China's Emperor" at Royal Ontario Museum, March 8 - September 1, 2014; and at Vancouver Art Gallery Oct 18, 2014 - Jan, 2015]


Imperial Yellow Bowl
萬曆款黄釉碗
Porcelain with yellow glaze
Ming dynasty, Wanli mark and period
Diameter 14.5 cm
Royal Ontario Museum 2013.43.1




In almost every medium and form, the colour yellow was exclusively used for the imperial family. Utensils like this bowl were for everyday use in the Forbidden City, but bowls in imperial yellow (minghuang 明黄) were
restricted to the emperor, empress dowager, and empress. Imperial consorts used yellow bowls with white interiors, while the high-rank concubines used yellow bowls with green dragons.

This rare yellow-glazed monochrome bowl was designed and commissioned by the court of Emperor Wanli, and made exclusively at the imperial kilns at Jingdezhen 景德鎮. Wanli, the thirteenth emperor of the Ming dynasty, ruled the country for over 40 years (1573–1620). During his reign, Manchu people living north of the Great Wall established the Qing dynasty, which became a political and military rival of the Ming court. The Qing took over the Ming court at the Forbidden City in 1644.

The Imperial yellow bowl was the latest acquisition to the Chinese collection of the Royal Ontario Museum thanks to the Louise Stone Acquisition Fund.




[For more, please consider purchasing the exhibition Souvenir guidebook]



Sunday, 9 March 2014

The Forbidden City: Inside Court of China's Emperors

(script read at the Media Press Conference for the opening of the Forbidden City: Inside Court of China's Emperors at ROM, March 5, 2014)


Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and members of the media. I am honored by the presence of so many special guests with us here today as the ROM is now ready to open its gates to the Forbidden City.

I am pleased that you are with us on this historic occasion - this is the very first opportunity for Canadians to view the Imperial Treasures, and to experience life inside the Forbidden City. For 500 years, it was accessible to only Chinese emperors, their immediate families and thousands of their servants. The average person, like you or me, was forbidden to know anything about – or to go within - the walls of the Forbidden City. Now we bring the Forbidden City to life right here at the ROM.


In the heart of Beijing, sits the largest palace complex in the world – the Forbidden City.  It was home to China’s last 24 emperors during the Ming and Qing dynasties. Tales about the lives of these powerful rulers and their imperial families who lived inside this mysterious place have captivated us for years.
Shortly after the revolution, in 1925 the Forbidden City was turned into the a public institution which opened its palace doors to everyone. Today, the Palace Museum houses a collection of over 1.8 million objects, many of which were hidden away in the vaults, unknown and unseen, until recently.
In 2009, the ROM was privileged to become the sole official Canadian partner with the Palace Museum – China’s largest museum. Since then, the ROM and the Palace Museum have explored opportunities to exchange exhibitions and engage in research and training programs. Our partnership with the Palace Museum speaks of the ROM’s long-standing contributions and commitment to developing important exhibitions in collaboration with respected, international institutes. Certainly, The Forbidden City, in collaboration with the Palace Museum, is the most ambitious undertaking to date.
It took Emperor Chengzhu of the Ming Dynasty 14 years to build the Forbidden City. And, it has taken ROM curators and dozen of staff more than two years to make this spectacular exhibition. The most exciting part of planning for me, is in December 2012, over the Christmas holidays, I, along with my two colleagues, Dr. Wen-chien Cheng, the exhibition co-curator and the ROM’s Chinese painting specialist, and Dr. Sarah Fee, the exhibition advisor and the ROM’s textile and costume curator, spent a week in the Palace Museum’s collection vaults, where we selected 250 of the finest, significant, and historically rich objects to be displayed in the ROM’s exhibition. None of these objects have ever been seen anywhere in Canada, AND more than 80 artifacts have never travelled outside the walls of the Forbidden City. ROM visitors will be the first to see these treasures outside the Palace walls. Today, YOU are the first to see these treasures. AND you will see….
·        A ceremonial suit of armour made more to dazzle than protect
·        The finest and rarest of all Ming Dynasty porcelains—only two original Chenghua chicken cups survive in the Palace Museum
·        Jades that have been sentimental to Chinese for more than 8,000 years
·        The brushwork of one of the most talented and artistic emperors
·        A dragon robe worn by a 6-year-old emperor on his inauguration
·        A gilt bathtub used by the last emperor of China, Puyi   
·        A silk coat for the royal dog – even the family pets were treated royally!
…And many more for you to discover on your own as you travel through the exhibition.
Due to the large presence of light-sensitive objects, there will be an extensive rotation at approximately the half-way point of the exhibition’s ROM engagement. I promise it will be worth a return visit!

Once my colleagues and I chose the objects, the exhibition started to take shape. The exhibition focuses on three storylines within the Forbidden City: people, places, and events. Main characters, such as Emperors Yongzhen and Qianlong, are highlighted with selected objects. Together, these two great rulers built the greatest empire in the entire 18th century in the East.  Empress Dowager Cixi - a towering and controversial presence during the twilight of the dynasty - is profiled as are officials, concubines, eunuchs, children, and foreign Jesuits. An interactive map is seen throughout the exhibition, raising the profile of major architectural complexes connecting the lives of people and objects on display. Narratives can be traced through objects and unfold in relation to the people, their characters, and the places they once inhabited.
These stories are illustrated throughout the exhibition by way of five sections, which incorporate five themes: Power and Privileges, Life within the Palace, Emperor’s Study and Collections, Fascination with Western Cultures, and Palace Museum. The exhibition’s layout and design follows the palace’s architectural design, and echoes the Forbidden City’s structural concept. The exhibition begins with an outsider’s view. However, as visitors make their way through the exhibition, they will experience first the Outer Court and then the Inner Court as they move increasingly into the palace’s restricted areas. Ultimately, access is gained to the most private space of all: the emperor’s personal study.
Power and prestige exposes how emperors were presented to the outside world, and ultimately how their private lives were concealed deep within the palace’s opulent interior realm. In the Outer Court, which is the exhibition’s section 2, the viewer witnesses the impressive world of luxury and imperial grandeur, power and ritual serenity. Here, objects tell stories of grand public events, stately ceremonies, imperial weddings, birthdays, New Year celebrations, and royal hunting excursions in the surrounding gardens. Among the highlights is a spectacular throne of lacquer, jades, and ivory. You cannot miss it, it is that grand!
Section 3 highlights The Inner Court and represents the female realm, a private space for the everyday lives of the emperors and their families. Here, we experience a sense of secrecy - expressed through informal displays.
The palace’s most private areas are revealed in section 4. Once restricted to all but the emperor himself, this is where the emperor’s artistic cultivation and mind-blowing imperial treasures are dramatically showcased for everyone’s viewing enjoyment.
Finally, Section 5 reveals the Twilight of the Last Dynasty, and portrays the Forbidden City’s last chapter as it began its transformation into what is known, today, as the Palace Museum.  Here, visitors learn about the fall of the empire during the last dynasty and the fate of the imperial palace’s precious treasures.
Following the ROM’s engagement, the exhibition will travel to the Vancouver Art Gallery from October 18, 2014 to January 11, 2015.  After  they travel to these two Canadian venues only - the treasures will return to Beijing, and back to the Palace Museum’s highly secured vaults and storage areas. I believe they will not travel again in the same assemblage.
ROM curators, designers, conservators, registrars, and many other support staff have worked around the clock to bring you this exhibition. Together with our colleagues, and now our good friends from the Palace Museum, I firmly believe that we have delivered a once in a lifetime, and fully memorable, experience of life in the Forbidden City. I am also honoured that The Forbidden City is considered to be the centerpiece exhibition of the ROM’s upcoming Centennial – a year-long celebration launching on March 19.
As I finish, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Robert H. Ho Family Foundation, the exhibition’s Presenting Sponsor, and Manulife Financial, its Lead Sponsor, for their generous support in helping us create this magnificent exhibition, and for making the Forbidden City accessible to the people of Toronto, Ontario, and Canada.
Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to the Forbidden City. Thank you, and enjoy your visit.





Wednesday, 5 March 2014

Living in Cultures & Commutating With Cultures

(Transcript from a talk to the Chinese Professional Association of Canada (CPAC), Enlight, the 3nd annual conference on March 2, 2014)

Thank you, Peter, for your kind introduction and thank you members of CPAC Enlight for your invitation to speak at your conference. It is my great pleasure to be here among such distinguished guests/speakers. Being a curator at the Royal Ontario Museum and a professor at East Asian Studies Department at the University of Toronto for 17 years, my career has provided me with opportunities to observe the origins of cultures, to learn about the diversity of cultures, and of course to teach my understanding of cultures. So today, with this invitation, you have encouraged me to think about how my understanding of cultures has helped me to become a member of the executive team at one of the Canada’s largest cultural institute, the Royal Ontario Museum.  The ROM has over 6-million objects, 29 galleries, and more than 300 full and part-time staff. As a Vice President, I am responsible for research and collection management of World Cultures including nine departments: East Asia, West Asia, Egypt, Greek & Rome, New Word Archaeology, Ethnology, Canadiana, European Art, and Textile and Fashion.  It is really the first time in my life that I have had to think about how my career connects these two aspects - living in culture, and communicating with other cultures.

Of all of us here today we are very fortunate to live and work in this wonderful country, Canada.  This is a multicultural society where we can be proud of our own cultures, and appreciate the diversity of others. Regardless, of what we do, what our professions are, where we apply our skills to do the work that we do, and where in fact we encounter other cultures.  Everyday we see cultural shocks, different cultural manners, cultural behaviors, cultural mixes, but mostly, I would say, conscious and unconscious, you are communicating with cultures with your colleagues, your managers, your co-workers and, your employees. Every word you say, every action you do, you are presenting yourself within your culture. Therefore, we need to take advantage of multiculturalism by learning from each other, but more importantly from our own cultures. My question to all of us is really, how much do we know about our own Chinese culture? Sometimes when we are in Canada, we take for granted that being a Chinese person living in Toronto we know more about Chinese cultures then our neighbours. But, is that true? I will get back to this in a few minutes. But first, let me ask you this - do we see any advantage to gain in our careers by knowing more about other cultures?

Yes, take my own personal experience for example; I studied Chinese archaeology and cultural history in China before I came to North American to complete my graduate education about twenty-five years ago. At that time, I was probably only one of less than 10 Chinese international students outside China studying archaeology, most of my fellow students were studying engineering, computer sciences, physics, and chemistry in the 1980s and 1990s. It was regarded as strange to people to be studying archaeology outside of China. But, what were the differences between archaeology in North American and China – in the past I would have given you a ton of reasons, but today, I can just say one word – and that is “culture”.   I learnt at the University of Toronto how archaeology can make ancient cultures be relevant to our living cultures today and globally.  In China our universities tell our students how old an object is, and how great the things are that we have discovered in archaeology - which is meant to make us proud to be Chinese. For example,     terracotta warriors, in China we feel so passionate about this discovery, because it is one of the greatest finds in China and it makes us so proud. This idea that this is something we have and you don’t - too bad. But, frankly this is not a good way to communicate with culture, this is a form of communication that irritates your colleagues with other cultural background. But if we are able to use this discovery and tell your colleagues that 2000 years ago in China someone for some reasons made these terracotta warriors, and why, that would allow us to think what we are making today to landmark the history of next 2000 years? That is the difference of thinking and teaching.

When I applied for the ROM job in 1996, I was still a PhD student in the Anthropology Department (by the way, in the past three decades, I am still only one Chinese student graduated in archaeology from that department). I was lucky to be on the short list for interviews because I was considered as an extra, which means the Museum did not need to pay for my travel and hotel expenses in order to fly me in for the interview. I felt lucky in a way and also feel like I had nothing to lose and everything to gain in this experience. At the end, the museum selected me over the other four candidates who not only had PhDs in Chinese art and cultures, but who had work experience in a museum environment. I on the contrary had no work experience in a museum, and I did not study Chinese archaeology at University of Toronto, instead I focused on Canadian archaeology. Before that I also studied Near Eastern and Egyptian archaeology in the USA for my masters degree. The reason that ROM gave me the job is two-sided: on the one hand I had an understanding of global and comparative cultures, which meant that I would give a new perspective on Chinese cultures, and on the other hand, I demonstrated that I as a Chinese student was successful in studying Canadian and/or other cultures, therefore, I would have the potential to succeed in other tasks. Now today, I served on many occasions as the chair of search committees for new curatorial hires at the ROM.  In this role what I look for in a person is someone with a cultural understanding and the potential for success in both creative and innovative ways. Since you all are coming with strong cultural backgrounds, you need to turn this to your advantage.  It is not necessary that you are building your careers only in the field of your training and in the area you work at best. You can do something new and still be successful if you demonstrate you are competent to achieve your goal and work on your assignments. Your potential for success can be found in your understanding of cultural diversity.

Within past 12 years of working at the ROM, I have successfully brought three major Chinese exhibitions to Toronto: The first one was the Treasure From Sanxingdui, the Lost Civilization and Mysterious Bronze Age Archaeology in 2002. The second one was Warrior Emperor and China’s Terracotta Army exhibition in 2010, and the third is Forbidden City: Inside Court of China’s Emperor to be opened this coming weekend. All of these three major exhibitions are in collaboration with Chinese prominent museums and cultural institutes approved and supported by Chinese central government, so that Toronto and its visitors can truly view the hidden national treasures of China. Toronto’s Chinese media has used these opportunities to praise me for making a great contribution to the Canada-China cultural exchanges. To them, I was the one who was able to introduce Chinese cultures to Canadians by bringing Chinese national treasures or ancient artifacts to Canada to be appreciations by our western friends. But I laugh and disagree. I feel the objectives for cultural exchange is NOT just the appreciations of cultural phenomena. Focusing on something in my culture has and yours does not is a misleading in cultural exchange. I would say cultural exchange is to build a connection between diversified cultures, to find common origins and ground, and to make communications with cultures.

So really, what is the “culture”?  Let me first say Chinese culture is NOT just using chopsticks and drinking tea at Chinese restaurants, Chinese culture is NOT the dragon dances during Chinese New Year or the Moon Festival, Chinese culture is NOT about dragon boats and blue-and-white porcelains. The same can apply to American culture not being about eating at MacDonalds and what is found in Hollywood movies, African culture is not about hunting and camp dances, Indian culture is not about Buddhism and elephants, and French cultures is not just about art and wine. I still remembered the first year I took the anthropology course in 1990 at Tulsa University, Oklahoma. For the first time I learned the concept of “culture” from my American professor and I found it still is very useful. Culture is a learned pattern and behavior within a given society. Cultures are transformed within the societies, and cultures can be re-formed with introduction of new members of societies. Materials like food, objects, clothing, are manifestations of the societies that survive over the history, materials of which are being excavated in archaeological sites and displayed in the museum, but they are only remains of a culture, not cultural itself.

Culture is the belief people have learnt from  past generations and the belief people want to pass down to their children. Thinking about ourselves, we keep telling our children - those who are born and grow up in Canada  about Chinese culture, because we believe that is our culture, and we want them to know all about it. We use chopstick because we are told to by our parents, and we hold that belief and force our children to believe too. But at the end of the day, our sons and daughters learned more, in their own way, about living with today’s technology, social media, and culture from their schools, and they tried to distance themselves from what their parents told them to do. WHY, because we didn’t tell them why Chinese believe chopsticks or teas are good for them, at least not in the way our children are not convinced. 

Learning about culture is not just to observe cultural behaviors, it must inquiry why unknown behaviors happened. Why American love MacDonalds and French love arts, where this phenomena came from. When or if  Chinese love MacDonald and arts like American and French, or more than American and French, are they considered a part of American or French cultures. Of course, not! Really when we are dealing with food for example, do we know what are really in the minds of American, French, and Chinese?



Culture is what our philosophy, values, and views of the world are based on. Differences in cultures are the differences in perspectives like illustrated in this picture. To put all different perspective together and make this place a harmonic environment for the cat, the fish, and the kid, is really what you need to success in a working environment. Imaging in a work place, no matter if you are little poor fish, or an angry but scared cat, or you are an naïve body-type employee, or you are a big boss who are taking this photo, your survival in this place will be depending on how you can read the other minds, how you can feel what they feel, and of course, how you can understand their own cultures.

Therefore, you need to build a communication that can bridge these wired but real differences, to have a communication that can provide an understanding of foreign and unknown feeling, and a communication that can bring all these difference together. If you can do that, you will be admired and will be success in your areas of expertise. My point is: beyond your excellent and extraordinary skills and expertise in your field, regardless of your achievement in technologies and information, you just need to cultivate yourself with a foundation of culture, an understanding of cultural communication, because we are indeed living in this country of multiculturalism. We need to face that, and we should take advantage for ourselves.
In order to have an understanding of cultures, my advice is you start to visit a museum!!!

A museum is a place where the convergences of cultures from ancient time to the modern, and from Pacific to Atlantic oceans. This is where you can start to think NOT just what other cultures are represented, but to think what these different cultures in common. Therefore, if you are at a museum like the ROM, you look at the treasures on display, you can learn what they are; but importantly you would find very awarding, if you ask where these treasures were made in different cultures having something in common and/or the same objects having different values of views and beliefs in various cultures. That is what you need to find out at the museum, but just how much they are worthy!

I am going to give two examples from my exhibitions, how these messages can be read through the interpretation of museum display. My first exhibition in 2002 showcase the treasure discovered in 1986 at Sanxingdui of Sichuan province.  It is a great archaeological discovery in the last century. When we put artifacts together and displayed in the exhibition hall like this, we need to send out messages why they are significant.  In this case, I would tell our visitors, that back to 3000 years ago, within today’s China, we had very diversified cultures between Zhongyuan Central China and Shichuan Pingdi plain. But archaeological discovery show they also had cultural interaction, adopting materials and ideas from each other. It means, if we are talking about the cultural difference between China and America today, in another 5 – 10 thousand years, maybe this difference no long existed as we are already witness a globalization, that changes our understanding of cultural difference.

My second exhibition in 2010, the terracotta warrior exhibition, that everyone in the world knows about it. Most of my Chinese friends seems take it for grand that is the great pride of China. They never think of why the terrocotta warrior appeared only at that time. My western colleagues and friends were eager to know who was his crazy guy Qinshihuangdi to build such crazy things during the short time span? What did he think he was doing? I feel it is interesting, that such a great question has always asked by western visitors, but not Chinese who think we know enough about the Qinshihuangqi, the First Emperor.

This was the most successful exhibition in the ROM recent history, attracting 355,000 visitors, but I had to regrettably report that I have not seen enough our Chinese visitors in the gallery. My sense is that Chinese people believe we have seen these on site in Xian, why do we need to see then in the museum. But now you should know that you need to come to the museum not to just see objects, but to try understanding why these national treasures have become treasures. In my way of working on this exhibition, I tried to explain to the visitors through the display of the warriors and other objects from the Warring State period to Han Dynasty, a notion that how a marginal state raise to a powerful empire 2500 years ago, ending a 500 year war and conflicts, providing a foundation for a wealth and prospect society of Han dynasty. What it happened in our history may well happen again, and in fact, it is happening in China right now, after 200 years of wars and  social instability since the Opium War in middle of 19th century. The repeating history was then a process of cultural building, because the culture as I said is a learnt pattern and behavior.



Today’s museum has a very different mission than many decades ago when museum were just for displaying objects. At the ROM, we are building the museum to be recognized globally as an essential destination for making sense of the changing natural and cultural worlds. We as managers and curators at the museum are trying the best to interpret the cultural remains and objects to make them relevant to today’s worlds. We want our visitors to understand where we come from, and how the worlds have been changed, how can we survive in today’s changing working environment.

So please come and visit us at the Royal Ontario Museum, and you will find there is an entire world in the front of you. The objects in the museum they are not just arts and artifacts, they are not just ancient cultures, but they are a part of our living cultures. In understanding them, you will be able to make communication with cultures and to allow you to have a broad new perspective that helps you with the successful career. The ROM offers excellent networking opportunities for young professionals, including a Young Professionals Circle and signature event, PROM.  This year's PROM will be called "Forbidden PROM", inspired by the exhibition The Forbidden City: Inside the Court of China's Emperors.